Article Review

Assalamualaikum warahmatullahi wabarakatuh...
Hello guys, now i will show you the result of my article review..
This article review about Psycholinguistics, this is the assignment for my final exam :)

Nuriakhmetov, A. 2012. Psycholinguistic Correlates of Progress in Literature of Students of Russian Vocational Training School. Psychology Research, 2, 706-710.

13 January 2019

Sapitri, Putri Adrian

University Lancang Kuning

This 5-pages research article of the Psychology research  was published by Aidar Nuriakhmetov by Sterlitamak Branch of Bashkir State University, Sterlitamak, Russia in 2012. This article is very good from other psychology articles because until 2019 psychology articles are still focused on professional skills, while this article focuses on individual speech and psychological characteristics. This article describe psycholinguistics correlates of progress in literature, discovered on the basis of correlation analysis of grades, and results of several psychological and psycholinguistics tests were taken in the context of comprehensive psycholinguistics research based on one of Russian Vocational Training Schools. Analysis is revealed a list of psycholinguistics characteristics related with progress in literarure. Then, this article does not explain what the intended to do in this psycholinguistics study. The author must explain what the aims of this research in the author’s goals. The author only explains what the article him wrote and what method him did to find out about the psycholinguistics characteristics associated with progress in the literature. So, in my opinion the author conducted this study to find out the psycholinguistics characteristics of what if students have high literature values.

This research has been ongoing for 2 years, involving 100 male students on the grounds that speech and psychological characteristics have a direct impact on students’ ability to write and read which serves as the basis for taking over professional discipline. 4 subjects include (Literature, English, Russian, and Bashkir) are activities carried out every time and every day in the lives of students as social beings.

While personality is still a very complex mystery to date.  It’s characteristics have been identified by Catell, whom developed 16 personality factor questionnaire. This personality test consist of 164 statements about your self, for each indicate how accurate it is on the scale of (1) disagree (2) slightly disagree (3) neither agree nor disagree (4) slightly agree (5) agree. With the second method is Leonhard-Smisheks, the author wants to determine character  accentuation but, this variable is not explained by the author. Characteristics accentuation is the application of a typological approach to his studies. This test consist of 88 questions that require a “yes” or “no”. Because it is very dynamic and changeable it is also determined the Rusalov’s method, which is a questionnaire in the form of self report with a likert scale format. 4 characteristics, however, remain largerly consisted within life span . So, the author tested them with communication and organizational ability detection test. Which is a 40 “yes” or “no” questionnaire. To get reflexive responses, the author provoke the students with associate experiment where the author says 20 stimulus words. Lastly, to check the students’ ability in using words Cloze Test was used to make students try to fill in the blanks .

Finally, the methods and results were explained well, the conclusion fell dramatically short , and there wasn’t even any discussion. It should be in the conclusion that the writer can conclude what the contents of the article are and in the conclusion section the writer can explain how the results of each test are done. 

this is the article I reviewed, you can check here..  

https://www.google.co.id/url?q=https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED539405.pdf&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwj216aHre3fAhWLLY8KHUCKBnMQFjAAegQIAxAB&usg=AOvVaw3mtHOR_HCzA0bp2DS7Kg6V